This saved me buying such a lens separately and making the change myself. Moreover, GitUp decided to try an "experiment" putting a rectilinear lens in some of the Git2's at a small price increase. If it turned out not good enough quality for that, at least it might produce some good enough free standing clips that were a step up from "Full HD". Since I could stretch this in post to UHD, I thought that it might be usable as "B cam" fill later in UHD productions. This camera supported a "UHD-like" anamorphic format of 2880 x 2160 at 24 fps, which displayed as 3840 x 2160 "UHD". Among my first efforts was the GitUp "Git2" action camera. Instead, I decided to convert slowly and make do with whatever I could find to bridge the gap.
Gitup git2 action camera review full#
When I decided to move up beyond Full HD video (1920 x 1080p) around 2016 - 2017, the prices for the available cameras were a substantial jump. I commend them for "sticking to the rule" of testing literally the cheapest products in their classes, but I commented that better video cameras were available for only a little more, though in retrospect, I do acknowledge that such cameras often need either modifying or working around shortcomings. Chris had a fun time with his Olympus stills camera, but Jordan's experience with his "Safari 5D" action camera was painful and expressed it so. They bought the lowest cost "new" stills and video cameras (the still camera was a discontinued product, but bought "new") from their favorite store and ran their standard tests, and gave fair reports.
I think that this was a semi-serious effort.
0 kommentar(er)
